Temple Daily Telegram - tdtnews.com

Your name

Your email

Send to (email address)

Personal message

News

When the smoke clears

Smoke caused by explosions from Israeli military operations hangs in the sky over the outskirts of Gaza City, seen from the Israel-Gaza Border on Friday. The U.N. Security Council called for an “immediate” and “durable” cease-fire in Gaza, but an intense bombardment of missiles from Israeli jets and helicopters early Friday and a barrage of Hamas rockets indicated there would be no rapid end to the fighting.
JERUSALEM - Israel will drive a hard bargain to halt its offensive in the Gaza Strip, with no truce deal likely unless it crushes Hamas’ ability to launch rockets and smuggle in weapons.

For Hamas, the sticking point is the opening of Gaza’s borders - something that could cement the Islamic militant group’s rule in the impoverished territory.

Despite protests abroad about the deaths of hundreds of Palestinian civilians, the Israeli incursion has overwhelming backing in Israel, where people are eager to deliver a decisive blow to Hamas and restore a sense of normalcy to the country’s rocket-threatened south.

The stakes are particularly high because national elections are only a month away. Israelis are disillusioned with government failures, and showing strength is a good way to boost a politician’s fortunes. With Israeli casualties relatively low and Hamas suffering losses, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Defense Minister Ehud Barak are quickly rising in the polls.

This may help explain why the army has mostly refrained from entering heavily populated areas in Gaza, knowing that popular support for the war - and those prosecuting it - could take a major hit if Israeli casualties mount.

Israel is coming under intense international criticism for the fighting, including a U.N. call for a war crimes investigation into the shelling of a house whose inhabitants said they were taken there by Israeli forces before it was bombed.

Ironically, those waging the war are part of Israel’s “peace camp.” Livni, Barak and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who is about to step down to fight corruption charges, all favor giving up territory to make room for a Palestinian state.

Livni, who seeks to replace Olmert, leads Israel’s current peace negotiations with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, whose Fatah movement now runs only the West Bank after Hamas violently overran Gaza in June 2007. Gaza and the West Bank - two territories on opposite sides of Israel - are together supposed to make up a future Palestinian state.

So if Livni and Barak get an electoral boost from the war, as seems likely, they may be able to defeat former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose focus was not on peace talks.

That could make life a lot easier for President-elect Barack Obama, and for pro-peace forces in the Middle East that have an interest in seeing a weakened Hamas, which gets much of its support from Iran and whose control of Gaza makes an Israeli-Palestinian peace treaty all but impossible.

On its side, Hamas takes a tough line, too. It is looking for more than an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. It wants the territory’s borders opened - and it wants to be recognized as a legitimate player in the Middle East.

Mohammed Nazzal, a senior Hamas official based in Syria’s capital, dismissed the U.N. Security Council’s cease-fire resolution by complaining that the militant group did not have a seat at the table when it was drafted.

“Nobody consulted Hamas or talked to Hamas,” he told Al-Arabiya television Friday. “Nobody put Hamas in the picture and yet Hamas is required to accept it. This is unacceptable.”

Osama Hamdan, a Hamas envoy to Lebanon, also dismissed the U.N. resolution. Hamas “is not interested in it because it does not meet the demands of the movement,” he told Al-Arabiya.

Still, a debate is taking place within Hamas over whether to go for a truce - with the Syrian-based leadership rejecting one, with many Hamas members inside Gaza seeing it as their only option.

Hawkish Israelis are calling on the army to use this opportunity to topple Hamas. But that seems unlikely because it would almost surely require Israel to occupy the Gaza Strip indefinitely - just three years after the Jewish state pulled its troops and settlers out of the territory.

With Fatah routed in Gaza, no obvious Palestinian alternative to Hamas exists there and Abbas’ people have made it clear they have no desire to retake the territory on the back of Israeli tanks.

For Palestinian lawmaker Hanan Ashrawi, no political benefit can justify the carnage in Gaza, which she said ultimately serves only to undermine peace efforts and enhance Arab extremism.

Israel’s government, of course, sees it differently, saying the country “has the full right to protect its citizens.”

Hamas, like Israel, rejected the U.N. resolution calling for an immediate truce.

* View the complete article in today's print edition. Subscribe or Pick-Up Your Copy Today.
PREVIOUS ARTICLE
Boat show opens with a splash
 
 
 
Home | News | Sports | Classifieds | Real Estate | Entertainment | Extra | Help | Subscribe | Advertising
Temple Daily Telegram
Copyright © 2009, Temple Daily Telegram